[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-37?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Olivier Lamy reopened DIRECTMEMORY-37:
--------------------------------------

      Assignee:     (was: Raffaele P. Guidi)

reopen to set fix version field
                
> Update the MemoryManager API so it can be used in conjunction with NIO to 
> provide efficient buffer management
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRECTMEMORY-37
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-37
>             Project: Apache DirectMemory
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Hiram Chirino
>
> If MemoryManager implemented something like a ByteBuffer allocate(int size) 
> then I could be used to directly transfer data to/from Files and Sockets 
> without having to first copy them to a byte[].
> I'm not talking about using the ByteBuffer.allocate call. I'm talking about 
> adding a method to MemoryManager:
> ByteBuffer bb = MemoryManager.allocate(1024*1024);
> So that I can directly modify the ByteBuffer using Channels to avoid a memory 
> copy.. Compare this to using the MemoryManager store, update, and retrieve 
> calls. They all force you to work with byte[]s so you end up doing a memory 
> copies into and out of direct memory.
> This was originally reported at: 
> https://github.com/raffaeleguidi/DirectMemory/issues/49#issuecomment-2661141

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to