I think you may want some defragmentation still, especially if the buffers a fair % full and the free pointers are spread, would mean that if any larger object that the free pointers arent large enough for, but in total could hold, without defrag would mean wouldn't be able to store.
On 2 Mar 2012, at 07:15, Benoit Perroud wrote: > Hi All, > > Now with DIRECTMEMORY-40 done and a new slab's style allocator, I > wonder if DIRECTMEMORY-9 is still relevant or if it could also be > closed. > > Thanks, > > Benoit.
