+1 On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Michael André Pearce < [email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for the parts that are core direct memory off heap, though keep the > cache service, and caching components in cache package or cache sub package > in core to differentiate component behaviour. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2 Mar 2012, at 13:26, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 and not only, IMHO classes in o.a.d.cache packages should be moved > > in the main package > > > > -Simo > > > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Daniel Manzke > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> 2012/3/2 Benoit Perroud <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Hi team, > >>> > >>> WDTY about moving the "directmemory-cache" folder into a more simple > >>> name "core" ? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Benoit. > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Viele Grüße/Best Regards > >> > >> Daniel Manzke >
