Hello list, I notice that if symlinks are backed up, they are obviously not hard-linked between the snapshots, but consume their own inode in each snapshot. The link count is "1" every time.
For me this is somewhat annoying, because in the dirs I try to back up I got many symlinks. Although a symlinks does not take too much disk space, these many together, multiplied with the number of snapshots, consume some space. Am I doing something wrong, or is this working as it should? Sorry if this is some stupid question... Thanks in advance! Dirk _______________________________________________ Dirvish mailing list [email protected] http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish
