On 06.09.2013 11:17, Dave Howorth wrote: > I suppose that it should not be necessary to run hardlink after dirvish, > in theory. dirvish uses rsync and instructs it to make hard links > between the backups. Any dupes in the original data are better fixed by > running hardlink or similar on the original data, not the backup.
I suppose that dirvish only links identical files across images, NOT multiples inside the same image. For that, hardlink may be useful. Cheers V. -- "We have opensource facial hair: if one guy has a big beard we all copy his code and get our own beards." -- LordKhravv, commenting on blog.wolfire.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dirvish mailing list [email protected] http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish
