> > For broader classifications, there's nothing wrong about tracking tasks.
I agree in theory, but I'm trying not to advocate against standard practice in the developer community. The first link I sent states "In Phabricator, it would be better to create a Project (tag) to categorize this type of work", and the entire sentence (!) is linked to the other page, which states: Creating *new* tracking tasks (tasks that "automatically" get resolved when > all its dependency tasks are resolved) in Phabricator is discouraged. It is > recommended to create a project > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Creating_and_renaming_projects> > instead. So it seems that someone somewhere doesn't like tracking tasks. Neither discussion page shed any light. The whiteboard sounds very nice. I found this ticket <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T64374> from about 2 years ago, and the idea of "personal tags" or something else similar to the Bugzilla whiteboard for Phabricator was discussed very, very briefly and the ticket declined and closed. Trey Jones Software Engineer, Discovery Wikimedia Foundation On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote: > In bugzilla's last years we've had a field "whiteboard", used for personal > notes. You could just edit the task description to add your own keywords at > the bottom. For broader classifications, there's nothing wrong about > tracking tasks. > > Nemo > > > _______________________________________________ > discovery mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery >
_______________________________________________ discovery mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery
