On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/24/2017 10:50 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: > > Would it be easy to label each panel, to avoid confusion? > > Not really, I'd have to build something. > Bummer, but understandable. You might explain the layout in future instructional emails. > > 2nd and 4th aves weren't highlighted as major streets before, but now they > are. But 1st isn't. Google highlights 1st, 2nd, and 4th. I'm not sure what > is most accurate. > > > 2nd and 4th are primary and 1st and 3rd are secondary. > Interesting. It's curious that Google disagrees with that assessment. Maybe it's an intentional copyright infringement detection error. > > The SR 99 tunnel is never shown any more. In the old style, at zoom 15, it > was clearly labeled, but the tunnel itself was barely visible. At 16, it > was both visible and well-labeled. > > > It's tagged as being under construction, I'm surprised the old style shows > it at all: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135476223 > It is in fact under construction, so the new display makes sense. > It also depends on the density of the region. In Downtown Seattle, bus > stops are not particularly useful at z16. In other places with less buses, > they are. I've gone back and forth on this a few times and there isn't > really a right answer. > Indeed. Thanks for your replies! Kevin
_______________________________________________ discovery mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery
