I , too, am an Ubuntu 6.06 user.  What were you attempting to fix by modifying gnuradio-core/aclocal.m4?

Mark

On 6/26/06, Robert McGwier < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lamar:

I installed Ubunto 5.X and GnuRadio just made and ran after I used apt
(synaptic) to download any package GnuRadio could not find.  With Ubunto
6.0X  I had to make a modification to aclocal.m4  (and I am sure there
are other ways to fix it) in gnuradio-core but otherwise,  it just
compiled and ran.  It is easy to install and maintain and with the
opening up to universe, multiverse,  nongpl code as opposed to Debian on
which it is based,  I find I am not building out of necessity.  I have
CHOSEN (for example) to build swig.1.2.latest for various reasons but I
did not need to.


Bob


Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42, Marcus Leech wrote:
>
>> FC6 is just around the corner--the TEST1 release is already available.
>> Sigh.
>>
>
> Yeah, I had sworn I wasn't going to get back on the Fedora roller coaster;
> that's why I use CentOS of the servers.  But the needs of the bleeding edge
> have conspired to cause me to go with FC5.... the needs being driven by
> GNUradio in part, and Plone in part.
>
>
>> But with YUM, it's relatively painless to "keep up".
>>
>
> Depending upon your bandwidth, at least.
>


--
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
Time for a new motto, what should I choose?



_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio



--
Mark
AE6RT
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to