On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 10:19:19AM +0100, Trond Danielsen wrote: > 2007/1/13, Johnathan Corgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 16:12 +1030, Berndt Josef Wulf wrote: > > > >> I can't see the point for doing so. I don't care if its takes me 15 > >minutes or > >> 30 minutes to compile all GNU Radio. > > > >The biggest improvement isn't the compile time, it's the fact that the > >memory working set for g++ when compiling the previous > >gnuradio_swig_python.cc file was 650 MB. This would cause massive swap > >thrashing on machines with say, 512 MB of RAM, or less, and drive the > >compilation time up to potentially hours. > > > > This is great! I have a fairly new machine with 1G ram and a dual core > AMD cpu, and compiling GNU Radio used to bring the computer to its > knees :), so this is a great improvement.
Glad to hear that it's working for you! > It is also good news as I intend to run GNU Radio on my EKIFA single > board computer, which only has 128MB of RAM. > Trond Danielsen Running in 128 MB should be find. I think that compiling in 128MB may still be a challenge. You may want to consider a cross-development setup. Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio