Eric, When I added /usr/local/lib to ld.so.conf
The build was sucessful Tim On 3/1/07, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:00:37AM -0800, Johnathan Corgan wrote: > Tim Meehan wrote: > > > tim /etc/ld.so.conf > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib > > /usr/lib/atlas > > > > /usr/lib/libc5-compat > > /lib/libc5-compat > > /usr/i486-linuxlibc1/lib > > Here is mine: > > /usr/local/lib > /lib/i486-linux-gnu > /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu > /usr/X11R6/lib > > I don't recall if the first line is something I added or if it is the > stock configuration. > > > Some more possibly usefull infromation > > > > g++ -g -O2 -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual -o .libs/test_mblock > > test_mblock.o -pthread ./.libs/libmblock-qa.so -Wl,--rpath > > -Wl,/usr/local/lib > > On my Ubuntu 6.10 system: > > g++ -g -O2 -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual -pthread -o .libs/test_mblock > test_mblock.o ./.libs/libmblock-qa.so I recall something in a Debian or Ubuntu bug report about them changing whether or not they use --rpath based on whether the destination directory was listed in /etc/ld.so.conf. It appears that they are still doing this, and that this could account for the difference in behavior. (Seems a bit fragile...) Tim and Johnathan, can you each perform another experiment for me? First off do a "make uninstall" to ensure that the install path is empty. Then, Tim, please add /usr/local/bin to /etc/ld.so.conf and try ./bootstrap ./configure make make check Johnathan, try the opposite: remove /usr/local/lib from /etc/ld.so.conf then ./bootstrap ./configure make make check Thanks for your assistance on this. We may be honing in on the fundamental libtool change that was made in Debian and/or Ubuntu. Eric
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio