On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:49:50AM -0500, Steven Clark wrote: > Pardon the bump. Maybe I should simplify the question: > > With the packet modulator, is it possible to run the packet payload > bits through any kind of flow-graph/block during the rx_callback?
Yes. You could push the bits back into a message source, do what you like, and suck them back out of a message sink. No need for a separate flow graph, just more blocks (The top_block code currently has an implementation limitation that allows only a single top_block.) Eric > On Jan 27, 2008 6:39 PM, Steven Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 'lo all. > > > > I would like to place code in the rx_callback of the packet mod > > architecture that takes each received payload and runs it though > > gr.trellis's viterbi decoder. > > Should this be possible? > > > > It seems like I'd have to set up, run, and tear-down a flowgraph or > > top-block in the duration of the callback. But wouldn't this interfere > > with the top-block/flowgraph that was already existing for the packet > > demod framework? > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > -Steven _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
