Catalin- > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:00 PM, <discuss-gnuradio-requ...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:02:43 +0800 >> From: Liang Xin Áºê¿ <liangxin...@gmail.com> >> Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] About EEPROM and FX2(68013a) USB interface >> in USRP >> To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> Message-ID: >> <o2o2579940b1004120102j64b217c0pf2ff8431da1ca...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> Hi All >> >> I am developing a board with gnuradio which is like USRP. It is also use >> FX2LP(CY7C68013a) and AD9862, and I add some surroundings. >> >> I hope that my board can work well with gnuradio, but it seems like it can >> only support USRP now. So could you please give me some help, if I want to >> run gnuradio on my board. How should I do with it? > ThinkRF (www.thinkrf.com) is also developing GNU Radio compatibility > for its product. I have been working on this project for a few months. > We're interested in feedback on the approach we took. > > Our board is also an unconfigured Cypress FX2 on power-up, so we will > have a proprietary utility that changes the personality of the board. > Once that is done, the board "looks" like a USRP, presenting the > corresponding VID/PID and responding to the USRP USB protocol. > > We chose to have it show up as a USRP "rev 5" to distinguish it from a > real USRP, of which I believe the latest revision is 4. Is this likely > to conflict any time soon?
My suggestion would be to use 4.x and work out with Matt what the x should be... for example you might use 4.6 if Matt says that he's likely to jump a major rev number before he moves the minors to 4.5 This would give the advantage of "marking" your board with a more-or-less accurate time-frame and capabilities range. -Jeff _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
