On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:51:31AM -0600, Eric Schneider wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 17:14 +0200, Sylvain Munaut wrote: > > > Mmm, in the code I've read, the tx timestamp counter was different than > > the rx timestamp counter and with different reset signals. > > This is all from memory... > > There were two clocks, but the resets should have been tied together. > If the tx and rx clocks were not synchronized that would defeat the > whole point... > > I do remember experimenting with a single counter. I do not remember if > I ended up using 1 or 2 though. I do recall that timing was harder to > meet with a single clock. > > > I'm looking at git://git.ettus.com/ettus/fpga.git which AFAIK it the > > most 'official' repo I could find. > > I think that one is broken. > > > In which git is that code ? And more importantly, why isn't it in the > > main repo :) > > It was in the old svn repo. It seems to have been migrated to git: > > http://gnuradio.org/cgit/ets.git/tree/usrp/fpga/inband_lib?h=inband > > I'm not sure why it didn't merge into master. Probably because there is > not much use or interest in it.
Actually, I think it was because we weren't sure it worked and/or that there was no test code, and/or nobody said, "hey it really works!" It would be great to get it integrated somehow, since I know that Eric fixed many problems. > The main-line usrp source is now hosted > by Ettus, so we will have to work with them to make anything official. > > As I'd like the inband function to become mainline in the future UHD > > support, I think it's important to make sure the code is pushed. > > There was some recent chat about that... > > --Eric S. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio