On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:00:01 -0700, Colby Boyer  wrote:  

The two
boards should have different clocks, so there should be some frequency
offset. Even in typical SISO systems, you use a PLL block to deal with
this since you can't access the other LO because its physically
somewhere else. 

While receiving, the transmitter is still running at
full power to run the RFID tag. The transmitters carrier is down
converted by the receiver board. Unless I have a misunderstanding, and
the two daughter boards share the same clock there should be some
frequency offset.

?

Thanks,
Colby

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:44 PM, 
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:41:46 -0700, Matt Ettus  wrote:
 > On
04/19/2011 11:38 AM, Colby Boyer wrote:
 >> Hi All,
 >>
 >> In RFID
applications, a reader receives (backscatter from RFID tag) and
 >>
transmits (constant tone) at the same frequency. With commercial
 >>
readers, a single LO will be shared by the RX and TX chain. However, in

>> the USRP case, two separate daughter boards are used so different
LOs
 >> are in use for the RX and TX chain. So you should end up with
some
 >> frequency offset in RX chain due to mismatched clocks.
 >>
 >>
Is it possible to lock the LOs of a TX daughter board and a RX daughter

>> board, as you would for a traditional MIMO 2 TX or 2 RX setup? There

>> appears to numerous discussions and examples of the latter. I'm
thinking
 >> it would be possible. But I'm more of a systems guy and
less of a RF
 >> hardware guy, so any comments would be appreciated.

>>
 >> Thanks,
 >> Colby
 >
 >
 > As long as you set them to the same
frequency, they're already locked.
 > No need to do anything different.

>
 > Matt
 >  > _______________________________________________
 >
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
 > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org [3]
 >
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio [4]

 True, for a
SISO system with TDD(not FDD) theres no problem for your
 kind of
application.
 Regards
 Agile Solutions

If you are using two separate
boards for Tx and RX, certainly you will experience relative frequency
offset between the two. 

Links:
------
[1]
mailto:i...@agile-sdr-solutions.com
[2] mailto:m...@ettus.com
[3]
mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
[4]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to