On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Martin Braun <martin.br...@kit.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:04:23AM -0400, Tom Rondeau wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Martin Braun <martin.br...@kit.edu> > wrote: > > > > I'd like to point out a disadvantage to get a discussion going: > > While you're developing, this might be an inconvenience because the > > files are physically separated. Most IDEs/editors have many features > > such as tagging, switching from headers to sources and vice versa, > 'go > > to file at cursor' commands etc. If half of the files are somewhere > > else, one has to set up the editor specifically for this dir > structure > > to do all of this. > > > > > > It's a logical separation that a lot of projects use. I know that I'm a > bit > > biased because my "IDE" is Emacs, but I don't recall having project files > in > > different directories was a problem. Way back when I developed in Windows > and > > used Visual Studio, this wasn't an issue, but that could have been due to > the > > project file that VS kept. > > > > > > We haven't made it part of our official standard, but talking with both > > Johnathan and Josh last week about it, I was thinking that we would. I'm > not > > sure that your argument here has quite convinced me that it'll be a > problem. > > To be honest, > > after re-reading this, I'm not even convinced myself. > Sometimes I just like to argue :) > > Martin Always good to have the discussion. I think we're settled on the use of include directory, then. Thanks! Tom
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
