On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Alexandru Csete <oz9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Rondeau <trondeau1...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Josh Blum <j...@joshknows.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?id=56fcd5f9b22af33976f9413d3a9d0aec41a7b556 >>> >> >>> >> -josh >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Marcus, would you be up for trying that? The resulting la files do not >>> >> match what comes out of autotools. We don't know if they will work, >>> >> despite their differences, and it'd be good to know. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Tom >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >>> >> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >>> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >>> >> >>> > Yeah, I'll give it a try tommorow evening sometime. Farking day job >>> > gets in the way of all the >>> > fun stuff :-( >>> > >>> >>> This was fixed a month ago. Just clean your install. >>> >>> http://gnuradio.org/redmine/issues/473 >>> >>> -josh >> >> >> I believe the problem is that he NEEDS the .la files for the gr-fcd >> compilation. So either the gr-fcd would have to be worked on to link a >> different way, or we would have to provide the .la files (and make sure >> they are correct). >> >> > Actually, gr-fcd can link against .so but apparently the autotools prefer > .la if they are present. > I had issue with the cmake generated .la file a month ago and Josh > suggested to disable generation of .la files, see > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2011-10/msg00512.html > > Alex > Alright, good. Just making sure we didn't actually need the .la files. Which is good, since making them "correctly" (that is, identical to the output of autotools) could have been a real pain. Thanks! Tom > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
