On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Michael Dickens <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 5, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Tom Rondeau <[email protected]> wrote: >> I just tested that on my Linux machine and nothing seems to suffer for >> it. I doubt that we require it. I've just posted this branch on my >> github repo "git://github.com/trondeau/gnuradio.git" called >> asm_for_clang. >> >> This shouldn't be an issue with the next branch, though, since we've >> removed that filter code as it's all replaced by hr-filter. > > Yup; somehow I buffed the relative path for my "next" checkout; it seems to > compile using clang without those changes. Whew. I thought I remembered > this issue being fixed; so, I'm not entirely crazy after all! Thanks! - MLD
Great, good to know. If that branch with the patch for master is working for everyone, I'll merge it into master. We obviously want our 3.6 versions to continue to work as well as possible even if we are migrating away from that particularly troublesome code. Tom _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
