On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Johnathan Corgan <johnat...@corganlabs.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Stamper, Brian <stamper...@osu.edu> wrote: > >> >> generic 99% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 192 > > > I'm curious which QA tests failed for you when everything was set to > 'generic'. >
All tests had these two failures, including generic: 114 - qa_ctcss_squelch (Failed) 151 - qa_constellation_receiver (Failed) Again, #114 has assertion errors and #151 is a seg fault. Here I just used ctest -V -R qa_ctcss_squelch: Start 114: qa_ctcss_squelch 114: Test command: /bin/sh "/home/brian/SDR/gnuradio/build/gr-analog/python/qa_ctcss_squelch_test.sh" 114: Test timeout computed to be: 9.99988e+06 114: .FF 114: ====================================================================== 114: FAIL: test_ctcss_squelch_002 (__main__.test_ctcss_squelch) 114: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 114: Traceback (most recent call last): 114: File "/home/brian/SDR/gnuradio/gr-analog/python/qa_ctcss_squelch.py", line 81, in test_ctcss_squelch_002 114: self.assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual(expected_result, result_data, 4) 114: File "/home/brian/SDR/gnuradio/gnuradio-core/src/python/gnuradio/gr_unittest.py", line 85, in assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual 114: self.assertEqual (len(a), len(b)) 114: AssertionError: 39 != 31 114: 114: ====================================================================== 114: FAIL: test_ctcss_squelch_003 (__main__.test_ctcss_squelch) 114: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 114: Traceback (most recent call last): 114: File "/home/brian/SDR/gnuradio/gr-analog/python/qa_ctcss_squelch.py", line 106, in test_ctcss_squelch_003 114: self.assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual(expected_result, result_data, 4) 114: File "/home/brian/SDR/gnuradio/gnuradio-core/src/python/gnuradio/gr_unittest.py", line 87, in assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual 114: self.assertAlmostEqual (a[i], b[i], places, msg) 114: AssertionError: 0.8 != 0.0 within 4 places 114: 114: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 114: Ran 3 tests in 0.012s 114: 114: FAILED (failures=2) 1/1 Test #114: qa_ctcss_squelch .................***Failed 1.26 sec And here I used gdb in conjunction with qa_constellation_receiver_test.sh, as before. It took 5 tries before it failed again: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xad7f8b40 (LWP 26744)] 0xb6ac1e1a in fcomplex_dotprod_sse () from /home/brian/SDR/gnuradio/build/gnuradio-core/src/lib/libgnuradio-core-3.6.4.1.so.0.0.0 (gdb) bt #0 0xb6ac1e1a in fcomplex_dotprod_sse () from /home/brian/SDR/gnuradio/build/gnuradio-core/src/lib/libgnuradio-core-3.6.4.1.so.0.0.0 #1 0xb6ac0880 in gr_fir_ccf_simd::filter(std::complex<float> const*) () from /home/brian/SDR/gnuradio/build/gnuradio-core/src/lib/libgnuradio-core-3.6.4.1.so.0.0.0 #2 0xb3836f70 in digital_pfb_clock_sync_ccf::general_work(int, std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >&, std::vector<void const*, std::allocator<void const*> >&, std::vector<void*, std::allocator<void*> >&) () from /home/brian/SDR/gnuradio/build/gr-digital/lib/libgnuradio-digital-3.6.4.1.so.0.0.0 #3 0x08be43f0 in ?? () #4 0xb10007fc in ?? () #5 0xb1000040 in ?? () Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) (gdb) _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio