See this post in context
http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/2012-September/005352.html


On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Marcus Leech <mle...@ripnet.com> wrote:

> I believe that they are all dropped, but Josh can comment more
> definitively.
>
>
> on Jun 10, 2013, *Sean Nowlan* <sean.now...@gtri.gatech.edu> wrote:
>
> Do late packets always get dropped by the USRP? What happens if its
> buffers get filled up with samples, all of which are late?
>
> "Marcus D. Leech" <mle...@ripnet.com> wrote:
>
> >> L = late packet, there was a time on the packet which was> time on
> >> device when
> >>
> >>
> >There are two different "cases" for late packets happening.
> >
> >The first is that you haven't sent your packet far enough in advance to
> >account for latency variations on the host. Unfortunately, on a
> >general-purpose
> > OS like Windows or Linux, latency variability can be extreme, and for
> >long-running flow-graphs you might need to develop a good model to
> determine
> > what the worst-case is and account for that.
> >
> >The second is that the clock on the USRP and the clock on the host will
> >tend to drift apart over time, particularly if both of them are "free
> >running".
> > So when you schedule timed bursts far enough in advance during the
> >start of a "session", it's entirely possible that after quite some time,
> the
> > two clocks have drifted apart unfavourably in terms of allowing you
> >to schedule things far enough in advance, relative to the USRP clock.
> > PC clocks are *terrible* by themselves. They'll drift significant
> >fractions of a second on a daily basis without any outside steering.
> > The USRP
> > clock, even free-running, is typically much, much better.
> >
> >
> >--
> >Marcus Leech
> >Principal Investigator
> >Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
> >http://www.sbrac.org
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> >Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to