OK, pushed, could you see if that works better?

Thank you
Andrew


On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Davis <glneolistm...@gmail.com>wrote:

> It was removed and left in fpll.h, i'll push a fix in just a bit, in
> the meantime you could just remove the include line from fpll.h
>
> Thank you
> Andrew
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:46 PM, M. Ranganathan <mra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I git cloned the atscfixup branch and tried building it. Here's as far as
>> I got:
>>
>> In file included from
>> /users/mranga/gr-atscfixup/gnuradio/gr-atsc/lib/receiver/atsc_fpll.cc:27:
>> /users/mranga/gr-atscfixup/gnuradio/gr-atsc/include/gnuradio/atsc/fpll.h:32:44:
>> error: gnuradio/atsc/diag_output_impl.h: No such file or directory
>>
>> Perhaps this file was accidentally left out of the repository (?)
>>
>> Ranga
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Johnathan Corgan <
>> johnat...@corganlabs.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/15/2013 07:01 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> > After this stuff and the reorganization a simple diff would not have
>>> > saved much, also i'm working on 'atsc_tx.py',so 'all_atsc.py' would
>>> > be confusing, hence the name change.
>>>
>>> First, let me say that I'm very happy this code is getting some
>>> attention. It was originally written to use the low-IF output of a TV
>>> tuner and ADC, and also when GNU Radio only had a single-threaded
>>> scheduler.  Later, it was only minimally modified to use the USRP
>>> complex baseband IQ output. (I wasn't around GNU Radio at the time and
>>> the above is only what I surmise by looking at the code history.)
>>>
>>> The changes you describe are more like it would have been written had
>>> the USRP existed at the time.
>>>
>>> The all_atsc.py file was a work-in-progress effort by Ben Reynwar that I
>>> merged in, but he and I never finished what we were going to do with it.
>>>
>>> > Also the other scripts seem unnecessary with the new
>>> > thread-per-block sceduler, the also seem to cause a lot of beginners
>>> > confusion. So I felt they needed to go.
>>>
>>> Agree.
>>>
>>> > I have also built a ( semi ) working complex fpll for gr-atsc, this
>>> > removes the need for up-converting and the filtering after the
>>> > current fpll, my next atsc_rx will need the new script style. After I
>>> > finish updating the bit timing loop we will be almost real time I
>>> > believe!
>>>
>>> The upconversion and filtering is a large CPU waste when it could be
>>> done at baseband, but it seems this was just a quick-and-dirty way to
>>> get the baseband IQ from a USRP to look like a low-IF output instead in
>>> order to re-use what was already written and working.
>>>
>>> Real-time execution would be a welcome accomplishment!
>>>
>>> > P.S. I could still just do the diff to the old all_atsc.py and rename
>>> > if you want.
>>>
>>> No need.
>>>
>>> By the way, before any of this can be merged, we'll need a copyright
>>> assignment from you.  I'll email you off-list about how this works.
>>>
>>> Thanks again for working on this.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Johnathan Corgan
>>> Corgan Labs - SDR Training and Development Services
>>> http://corganlabs.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> M. Ranganathan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to