On 10/17/2013 10:52 AM, Martin Braun (CEL) wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:44:00PM +0200, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/5910/s2i3.png
I'm not convinced by the way you handle the complex part of the FFT result ...

You can't just drop it, it's needed for the reconstruction ...
You're right, but in this case the input was already real and the
"channel" doesn't modify the phase. So it's OK--the 'correct' thing
would be to do a real FFT.

See:
http://imgur.com/z733PGU

Works fine. If you want do to an ifft(fft(x)), you can't have windows
(feel free to do OS jokes here).

MB

Add "joke" windows to filter blocks:

   o Vista
   o XP
   o 95
   o 3.11
   o Blue-window-of-death

:)



--
Marcus Leech
Principal Investigator
Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
http://www.sbrac.org


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to