On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Martin Braun (CEL) <martin.br...@kit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:19:55PM +0100, Frederik Wing wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> what you are writing is completely right. Simply increasing the sampling >> frequency will result in a more complex filter. >> >> Nevertheless the firdes.low_pass function does NOT want to calculate the >> 101-tap-filter. But it DOES calculate the 100001-tap-filter. Really >> strange. So this might not be a memory problem. >> >> The "magic border" I described is at 1MHz. Not at 1GHz as I wrote >> accidentally. > > Can you post the exact call too firdes.low_pass(), thanks. > > MB
Yes, Frederik, I'm afraid you're not being clear. You say you can't build a 101 tap filter? That's different than what you were saying before. Are you saying that you can't go below 1e6 sps or above it? Tom _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
