On 01/18/2014 12:31 AM, Luke Hough wrote:
Get your tomatoes ready, I have attached a proposed block diagram and possible component specs. I have not actually purchased the limiter or the circulator, but I do have the power amp and antenna. The power amp is a ZVE-8G <http://www.minicircuits.com/pdfs/ZVE-8G+.pdf>. I was looking at the VLM-63-2W <http://www.minicircuits.com/pdfs/VLM-63-2W+.pdf> limiter and possibly a JCC3300T3800S10 circulator ( hoping for a sample ).

The numbers on the block diagram don't exactly match the specs shown. The numbers are closer to the table values. I have also not taken insertion losses into account.

Looking at the the B200 schematic <http://files.ettus.com/schematics/b200/b200.pdf>, I was wondering if during transmit I might set switch U807 to OUT2 while U805 is OUT1. Then on receive switch U807 back to OUT1. Basically, during transmit both RX1 and TX1 are set to use the TXRX1 antenna, but during receive, RX1 is switched back to antenna RX1. Can the switch be made in less than 1µs ?

I don't think the switch can be made in under 1us from the host. With suitable mucking-about on the FPGA you might be able to come up with a suitable
  scheme that amounts to half-duplex switching.

In the ordinary scheme of things the ATR state machine will switch the RX chain to the RX2 port during transmit. If this could be done fast enough, that would work fine, and you'd just put a terminator on the RX2 port in half-duplex mode.

You could consider a scheme where some external machinery is helping with switching and "scheduling" things. Such machinery would perhaps arrange
  for a high-isolation path for RX during your TX cycle.

This kind of problem is pretty standard in radar designs, so there are probably good solutions out there that could be hybridized to interface to
  an SDR approach.  But radar isn't my particular expertise.




On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Marcus D. Leech <mle...@ripnet.com <mailto:mle...@ripnet.com>> wrote:

    On 01/17/2014 09:37 AM, Luke Hough wrote:
    As a hobby project, I am developing an active radar. I
    am primarily familiar with simulation and signal processing, but
    not so much with RF hardware. So this is a learning opportunity.
    I do need to Tx/Rx on the same frequency either through a shared
    antenna or independent. I have constructed an antenna and
    measured the S11 parameter to be -11dB over a 300MHz band around
    the resonnant frequency.
    I was hoping to avoid a GPIO controlled switch. I don't think the
    B200 has any GPIO capability, so another controller device would
    be required. Would it be possible to control one of the skyworks
    switches on the frontend of the B200 in combination with a
    circulator and a limiter? Basically open the RX1 channel and keep
    the TXRX1 channel switched to the TX chain.
    -Luke
    Well, if this is a half-duplex application, the USRP already does
    switching.  Whenever the unit is transmitting, the RX is connected
    to the the RX port on
      the box.

    Why don't you draw a diagram of what your intended setup is, and
    we can through metaphoric tomatoes at it, as it were.



    On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras
    <ra...@schmid.xxx <mailto:ra...@schmid.xxx>> wrote:

        Hi,

        > +7dBm is *very* risky.

        Hmmm...3µs are not very long...but it is a risk, agreed.

        > If you're feeding a common antenna, the usual approach is
        to use a
        > diplexer/duplexer arrangement to isolate the TX frequency
        from the RX
        >    frequency (assuming different-frequency full-duplex).

        I guess he uses the same frequency for TX and RX - usage of an
        isolator/circulator makes me think so :) But this only works
        for a certain
        degree and requires no reflected power at all (that means,
        perfect impedance
        match) at the antenna port.

        Depending on the needed timing it may be an option
        constructing a PIN diode
        RX/TX switch, operated from some GPIO.

        > In fixed-purpose applications, like WiFi, where a common
        antenna is used,
        > there's a duplexor, usually implemented in some kind of ceramic
        >    resonator technology that has bandpass and band-stop
        components to it,
        > to keep the RX isolated very deeply.

        This will not work for WiFi, as this transmits and receives
        on the same
        frequency, they usually apply the above mentioned diode
        method to rapidly
        switch between RX and TX path.

        Those ceramic diplexers are common for cellphones and some
        digital LMR
        systems, as they have the need for full duplex on different
        frequencies.

        > --
        > Marcus Leech
        > Principal Investigator
        > Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
        > http://www.sbrac.org

        Ralph.

        --

        Ralph A. Schmid
        Mondstr. 10
        90762 Fürth
        +49-171-3631223 <tel:%2B49-171-3631223>
        ra...@schmid.xxx <mailto:ra...@schmid.xxx>
        http://www.bclog.de/




        _______________________________________________
        USRP-users mailing list
        usrp-us...@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-us...@lists.ettus.com>
        http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com





_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to