-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Actually, it's an USB1.1 full speed device (11Mbit/s), and that's totally sufficient for 192ksam/s at 16bit (which I guess is the spec). It does not benefit from USB2 or USB3 hardware.
As the funcube dongle pro+ is not a usb3 device, it does not get additional bandwidth by being plugged into an usb3 port. I don't think it even has the additional pins required to be an usb3 device. Greetings Marcus On 12.02.2014 16:13, Volker Schroer wrote: > If you run linux on your laptop try > > lspci -k > > and look for USB. Then you can find the controller type. > > USB 3 supports higher speed than USB 2 and should offer more > bandwidth. But on my desktop system the dongle only runs on the USB > 2 port not on the USB 3 port. The same happens with the funcube pro > that requires lower bandwidth than the pro +. On my notebook there > exists only an USB3 controller Intel 8 Series/C2200 and it works > flawless. > > --Volker > > > Am 12.02.2014 14:22, schrieb Nemanja Savic: >> Well, I have dell laptop but have no clue which usb controller it >> has. Now I am not sure whether I should by one or not. Anyway, >> should newer versions of usb have higher speed and thus >> bandwidth. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Volker Schroer <dl1...@gmx.de >> <mailto:dl1...@gmx.de>> wrote: >> >> The funcube pro+ works flawless on my usb 2.0 port. It seems >> that the bandwidth problem arises from the usb controller >> hardware. >> >> I use an ASROCK motherboard with SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 controller in >> use with the ohci /ehci kernel drivers. This controller works >> very well for me. >> >> The Inc. EJ168 USB 3.0 Host Controller instead does not work. It >> claims to have not enough bandwith but for both Funcube devices >> the ( pro and the pro+). >> >> -- Volker >> >> >> >> Am 12.02.2014 11:09, schrieb Alexandru Csete: >> >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Nemanja Savic >> <vlasi...@gmail.com <mailto:vlasi...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi all guys, >> >> I am about to buy funcube dongle pro +, and wanted to ask if >> somebody of u use it without any problems? >> >> >> Very few people use it on linux without problems. If you have a >> USB 1 port it will probably work, otherwise you will likely get >> the "insufficient bandwidth" bug. >> >> https://github.com/csete/gqrx/__issues/91 >> <https://github.com/csete/gqrx/issues/91> >> >> There are however no problems with the original Funcube Dongle >> Pro (the one without shortwaves and only 96 kHz bandwidth). >> >> Alex >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/__listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio> >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/__listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio> >> >> >> >> >> -- Nemanja Savić > > > _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio > mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS+5IQAAoJEAFxB7BbsDrLBpgH/jTgE5VPjOUoKtuimF4G5FrV B36TxXhklXpGOzE0qltI54lTLIYJLSo8aiLUfs47yEDriS5nR5XxbQoSktX5/+Vs sj1Fd0oP09eOfUlOi7Iw8L52eyleeABZRGWqriaqyDhlwWL7azi5VjecBRTAxY2M Px3OsDN28AsGmuNinr8NNy5Ma9XScae+Fa6u/37znOMCH1mLJ/yLFaPA3xk5BBfP Lu+UYOzPWH9zhPBw2XjydcAWig20hxgaOW3jNw3rCrbn452K81QdUkr11Cw0S6s/ e/OEAQ8UaNpthq5SFyAdhj2/v6VFSW9pwHgLAZOYmSI6tnYbtpqTPLvkEUBEQvw= =zZwF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio