I'll second what Moritz wrote: Since this pragma is "non standard but widely
supported", let's stick with the header guards since they are guaranteed to
work even with very old C / C++ compilers ... if someone wants to -also- use
this pragma that's fine; having both should not hurt. I'd prefer to not rely
on just the pragma ... my US$0.02 worth, if even that much ;) - MLD
On Feb 23, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Moritz Fischer <moritz.fisc...@ettus.com> wrote:
> some quick Google research found several contradictory sources. [1]
> calls it 'non standard but widely supported'.
> Since we build on weird platforms I think we should make absolutely
> sure that this is the way things should be done ^{TM}.
> Some other sources listed this as a potential speedup for compilation
> on Visual Studio. Discuss.
>
> Personally I don't have an issue with header guards because there
> exist plenty of plugins for {vim,emacs, whatever},
> to do it for you.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
