-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

A shoot, I overlooked the 64 decimation rate... Sorry about that.


On 25.04.2014 17:36, Anton Komarov wrote:
> Marcus, w/o AGC audio sometimes is creapy. I have tested AGC2,
> tried to play with attack and decay, but at last when there is a
> plane in the vicinity dongle overloads and sound become very loud.
> Then i tested FAGC and it fits well! 1024M/64 gives 16k and 256
> samples equals - 62 ms of signal. Works ok for me.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Marcus Müller <mar...@hostalia.de>
> wrote:
> 
> Actually I'm a little confused - Is seeing an AGC in an AM
> demodulator something you usually do? Especially the feedforward
> AGC should be rather err jumpy with a scope of but 256 samples,
> unless I'm missing something; f_sample seems to be 1024ksps, thus
> 256 samples max search and rescaling should behave very badly if
> there are baseband signal contents below 4kHz -- and that should be
> the case for audio, usually?
> 
> Greetings, Marcus
> 
> On 25.04.2014 16:03, Marcus Leech wrote:
>>>> An AM demodulator is a squaring function.  It can only
>>>> *ever* produce positive values.  You can remove DC offset by
>>>> using a high-pass filter after it. on Apr 25, 2014, *Anton
>>>> Komarov* <anton.koma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> But when we have only positive values that means in fact we
>>>> have 0.5 DC offset, and that is bad. Moreover i've made test
>>>> recording with GQRX - waveform is fine! Looking into the
>>>> code, nothing special, am demod->low-pass->wav-sink.
>>>> 
>>>> -- public PGP key http://pastebin.com/dqZqgyVE
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Michael Ossmann
>>>> <m...@ossmann.com <mailto:m...@ossmann.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 04:14:30PM +0400, Anton Komarov
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi, you can find in attach AM demodulator grc file.
>>>>> Everything is straight forward with demod but audio file
>>>>> generated looks weird. Only positive values of amplitude.
>>>> The particular definition of "amplitude" adopted by GNU Radio
>>>> (and pretty much everyone else in SDR as far as I know) is
>>>> "absolute value". It is correct for it to always be
>>>> positive.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
> 
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
>>>> mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org 
>>>> <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> 
>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org 
>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
>> mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org 
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEbBAEBAgAGBQJTWoU1AAoJEBQ6EdjyzlHtQAYH+KNwTI+XPjKFyb+kId+Y9fxv
uthK+LH7CTAm85j9gb4mIeGe7Wpe2gZZ0sqvDgyXL594urUSvfbmyCy/p0GI7WfC
evmwyX4HBZIuXBdqIkj0NdhvwpaBHBYUE1R2JfVIK1ZqaApNtGVxoKpOyI38XCg1
m68tsU3HASfVQxIWfuJS0mBgwPo8wSCTXLOoUqc1YTVXd+tXNNAVLbFEDUOgVuib
irkUhUYdNi85SwO3ildun/9xEwXB3g4FeB3Hq66TccE5M7zvZsOBa4oF/uKITRoG
cvOc/EuBRCG+u1lI2owwQXsUuGWmHhN+xcjtkzn4Qa+2b+zR9bPPGS70ru45vQ==
=+L1B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to