You're right -- that's one of the reasons why we try and keep the block's guts (their kernels) elsewhere than the actual block definition.
Not all of our blocks do this, though. M On 10/10/2014 12:03 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > Hello, > > this question my arise from my ignorance about C++, but I don't > understand how, if it is possible, to sub-class a GNURadio block that > has moat of his code in an _impl class. > > To my understanding I would need to subclass both the class defining the > block and his _impl class. However, it seems that the _impl class is not > part of the exposed API, therefore there is no way to subclass it. There > is way to achieve this without copying around significant portions of code? > > The case at hand is subclassing gr::analog::pll_carriertracking_cc > changing the phase_detector() method to use the regular atan2() instead > of the fast version. > > Thanks! > > Cheers, > Daniele > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
