Thanks for your response.

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: martin.br...@ettus.com
>Data: 25-gen-2015 18.29
>A: <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>Ogg: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] THESIS with CUDA
>
>Hey Marco,
>
>good luck for your project!
>
>FYI, there have been quite a few projects using GPPs in the past. I
>recommend going through the slides from all of the GRCons, you'll find
>something there (at the very least from the first GRCon).
>Also, there's gr-theano, which also uses CUDA, and for inspiration,
>having a look at gr-fosphor might be a good idea.
>
>For high-performance GR flow graphs, the overhead for ingress/egress has
>always been the problem. If you have ideas for modifying GR itself, it
>might be worth contacting the "Accelerators" working group, which
>discusses these matters.
Ye,I can imagine. Also because there are noticeable difference between 
different CUDA devices. And with OpenCL it can go worse, because there are 
devices of different categories too.

One of my possible idea in order to reduce it, is to merge different blocks on 
the same kernel:serial,"concatenating code",or in "parallel",where each warp 
elaborate different block; In this way is possible to use shared memory(which 
is very small).
But it is complicated(PTX code,while OpenCL can compile more easily; different 
schedule policy) and I will try it at the end,after time spent over more normal 
version,like multiple kernel communicating via global memory on-card. Latency 
will be my hell.
>
>Cheers,
>M
>


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to