On 22.05.2015 10:54, Michal Vaclík wrote:
> Yes, I am using default flowgraphs (examples) just adding Multiply Const
> block to avoid clipping due to high PAPR and obviously UHD blocks. Using
> FFT of 64 and default carrier configuration, sync does get better if I
> stretch this to wider bandwidths by setting higher sample rates at USRP.

Hey Michal,

I meant using the same signal bandwidth at higher sampling rates (i.e.
bigger FFTs, same number of occupied bins).

M


> 
> 2015-05-21 18:13 GMT+02:00 Martin Braun <martin.br...@ettus.com
> <mailto:martin.br...@ettus.com>>:
> 
>     On 20.05.2015 20:19, Michal Vaclík wrote:
>     > Hi, I am sorry for the delayed response.
>     >
>     > I checked the centering of the OFDM signal and it looks pretty good.
>     > Even looking at the signal's spectrum using SDR# on other computer was
>     > very nice - book-grade example of nicely shaped OFDM spectrum. Today I
>     > upgraded from GNU Radio v 3.7.6.1 to 3.7.7.1 and reception
>     > (syncrhonization and detection) has improved dramatically. Even at
>     > relatively low sample rate (1M, anything lower simply doesn't
>     > synchronizie). Unfortunately the received packets still weren't enough
>     > for any kind of real world transmission.
>     >
>     > Was OFDM improved in some kind of way in v3.7.7.1 (I don't see anything
>     > related to OFDM in changelog)? I simply launched the same flowgraph on
>     > newer version and it works much better.
> 
>     Hm, not that I recall... but good for you :)
> 
>     I forget, were you using the example codes with default settings? If so,
>     does doubling the sampling rate *without* changing the total bandwidth
>     (i.e. doubling the FFT size) help with sync at lower bandwidths?
> 
>     M
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>     Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>     https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> 


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to