Dear zs,
basically, Schmidl and Cox is a very good algorithm, because it can achieve the same quality of synchronization with half of the synchronization overhead compared to other approaches, or a better performance with the same amount. I must admit that from the top of my head, there's probably not much that's better than S&C in a real world OFDM receiver, but I must admit that I haven't implemented many OFDM synchronizers myself. However, you say > Now in my application,maybe this algorithm isn't enough. which means that you have a mathematical measure that's not OK for S&C, I guess. So in what way doesn't S&C suffice? What is it about your application that makes S&C insufficient or impossible to use? Best regards, Marcus On 06/24/2015 09:00 AM, zs wrote: > Dear all: > Thank you in advance. > 1. > I want to ask a question about the new ofdm > example.And I know the receiver have used the SCA(schmidl and cox > algorithm) algorithm.Now in my application,maybe this algorithm isn't > enough.And I want to ask whether have other good frequency offset > correction algorithm which have been implemented. > 2.What is the algorithm used by the old version of the > ofdm example?Thanks. > > Best regards, > zs > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
