The current PyBOMBS has SDK and cross-compile support. I do like the integration of bitbake, although I'm not sure how that would look and if you're turning PyBOMBS into something it's not.
Cheers, Martin On 03/07/2016 09:46 PM, Ravi Sharan wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > I agree that the ideas listed out in my previous mail doesn't take all > of the summer to implement. I which case, I would like to add another > point to my proposal. > > PyBOMBS support to Embedded WG - > > The idea is fairly simple. The current Embedded WG provides a > OpenEmbedded(OE) based SDK to develop and build OOT modules. I intend to > add a layer on top of PyBOMBS to work with OE tools (bitbake etc.,), for > setting up the environment for SDK and cross-compiling the OOT Modules. > The module author will have one less thing to worry about while > developing apps for supported embedded platforms. I need to do a bit of > homework on this front before I write the proper proposal and any help > from the embedded WG (Philip Balister) is appreciated in this direction. > > My plan (tentative) as of now is to roughly dedicate 5 weeks to > implement the app store in the beginning, 3 weeks for adding PyBOMBS > support to the embedded working group and 3 weeks for the CGRAN-PyBOMBS > integration (1 week) & CGRAN only work (2 weeks). Last two weeks will be > dedicated for sanity checks and bug fixes. > > Cheers, > Ravi Sharan > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:14 AM, West, Nathan > <n...@ostatemail.okstate.edu <mailto:n...@ostatemail.okstate.edu>> wrote: > > Hi Ravi, > > I like this. My only qualm is that I'd personally like this project > to include some more pybombs work to round out the still missing > features. I'm not really a Qt person, so I don't know how much > effort doing the app store is and if that leaves much room, but I > know that the CGRAN stuff won't take you all summer if you work full > time ;-) > > nw > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Ravi Sharan > <bhagavathula.ravisha...@gmail.com > <mailto:bhagavathula.ravisha...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am Ravi Sharan, currently pursuing MTech from IIT Hyderabad. I > am looking forward to participate in GSoC 2016 by improving and > integrating CGRAN and the newer PyBOMBS. I have earlier worked > on redesigning the current version of CGRAN with the help of > Nathan West. Here's a brief description of things I would like > to contribute to the GNU Radio project: > > *- Qt based GUI app store - * > Develop a simple, usable Qt based GUI app store to install GNU > Radio and OOT modules. This sub-idea covers fixing the existing > bugs in new PyBOMBS as well. > > *- Integrate PyBOMBS & CGRAN -* Enable installing OOT modules > from CGRAN site > This is an idea which Martin Braun put forward during the > initial discussions while developing the CGRAN 2.0. The idea is > similar to Ubuntu's AptURL > <https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AptURL>, where you can > install the packages from a web browser. Clicking the 'apt' > (#pun) URL, the browser redirects to the package manager to > install the package. > > *- Enhance CGRAN -* (from current level to level awesome?) > I intend to implement this sub-idea in two-fold - > *** Add features like clickable tags and grouping the OOT > Modules (to name a few) etc., according to their functionality > for better usability of the site. [Code Contributions] > *** Since the relaunch of CGRAN in April 2015, very few OOT > Modules have surfaced on the site. I would like to add more > documentation to the individual modules (like what works and > what doesn't, compatibility with the current GNU Radio API, > etc.,), thus populating CGRAN with modules listed out on the > site. This idea is more of documentation, but is a little time > consuming. > > I will document the above mentioned ideas in the form of > proposal based on the feedback I receive and would like to work > with Martin Braun and Nathan West during the GSoC period. Apart > from the ideas listed above, I am open for suggestions on what > could make a good proposal and better summer of coding. > > Thanks, > Ravi Sharan B A G > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio