Tsys is essentially irrelevant for HF receivers, since Tambient is much,
much higher (thousands of K) than even some really-poor RF engineering
scenarios. 

At HF, galactic background can be very high--1e4K or more. 

On 2016-03-30 10:30, Marcus Müller wrote: 

> Hi Daniel,
> 
> haven't made experience with any of these upconverters; but:
> 
> The really temperature-sensitive aspect of an upconverter is probably
> the oscillator, not the mixer. So the trick might really be keeping
> your upconverter in the same environment as your SDR receiver (assuming
> both don't have overly well temperature-compensated or oven-controlled
> oscillators), as that will just as much limit your frequency accuracy.
> 
> Mixer circuits do exhibit conversion loss that tends to get worse with
> rising temperature, but that'll not distort your signal much.
> 
> The core question here is whether you'll deterioriate your system
> performance if you keep your upverter far from your antenna; my guess is
> that you'd have an LNA close to the antenna, anyway, so keeping the
> upverter's oscillator warm and cozy near your SDR device won't be that
> complicated, probably.
> 
> That brings one down to the question whether you have the chance to use
> the same oscillator for both your SDR device and the upconversion; that
> way, you'd only have to worry about one device drifting under any
> circumstance. Does your device give you the chance to couple out a clock
> or maybe transmit a sine?
> 
> Best regards,
> Marcus
> 
> On 30.03.2016 09:18, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> 
>> Hi all, Has anybody been using any of the upconverters for SDR and has 
>> anybody made any comparison of them? I've seen some comments suggesting that 
>> many of the low cost models have poor thermal stability[1], has anybody seen 
>> problems with this in practice for receiving modes like SSB on amateur HF 
>> bands? If this is an issue, is anybody aware of alternative models that are 
>> more robust? Regards, Daniel 1. 
>> http://www.rtl-sdr.com/review-of-the-spyverter-upconverter/#comment-79953 
>> [1] _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing 
>> list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org 
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio [2]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio [2]
 

Links:
------
[1]
http://www.rtl-sdr.com/review-of-the-spyverter-upconverter/#comment-79953
[2] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to