Hi Martin,

Yes I did source the setup_env.sh file. I can call gnuradio-companion from
command line and the base install works fine. It's only when compiling OOT
modules that I have issues.

 I have not tried compiling without sudo, I will give it a shot.

Rich

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Martin Braun <martin.br...@ettus.com>
wrote:

> Richard,
>
> did you call your setup_env.sh before doing the compile? Also, you can
> run cmake with -Wno-dev to remove some more annoying warnings.
>
> On 06/04/2016 04:40 PM, Richard Bell wrote:
> > Sure no problem. Here is the output when I try to build a brand new or
> > pre-existing OOT module, notice the cmake warnings:
> >
> > rbell@rbell
> :~/Documents/pcodes/radio_devel/custom_grblocks/gr-add_tagged_stream_once/build$
> > cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/rbell/Documents/grprefix/ ..
> > -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 5.3.1
> > [...]
> > -- Configuring done
> > -- Generating done
> > -- Build files have been written to:
> >
> /home/rbell/Documents/pcodes/radio_devel/custom_grblocks/gr-add_tagged_stream_once/build
>
> Looks like this worked fine.
>
> > rbell@rbell
> :~/Documents/pcodes/radio_devel/custom_grblocks/gr-add_tagged_stream_once/build$
> > sudo make install
>
> You really don't want to 'sudo make' anything unless you really need to.
> Here, you don't, as far as I can tell.
>
> Martin
>
> > Scanning dependencies of target gnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once
> > [  4%] Building CXX object
> >
> lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.dir/add_tagged_stream_once_impl.cc.o
> > [  8%] Linking CXX shared library libgnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.so
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgnuradio-runtime
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgnuradio-pmt
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> > lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.dir/build.make:98: recipe
> > for target 'lib/libgnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.so' failed
> > make[2]: *** [lib/libgnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.so] Error 1
> > CMakeFiles/Makefile2:137: recipe for target
> > 'lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.dir/all' failed
> > make[1]: *** [lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-add_tagged_stream_once.dir/all]
> > Error 2
> > Makefile:138: recipe for target 'all' failed
> > make: *** [all] Error 2
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Marcus Müller <marcus.muel...@ettus.com
> > <mailto:marcus.muel...@ettus.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Rich,
> >
> >     currently unable to access my Ubuntu VMs; could you copy&paste the
> >     build log of your OOT? Also, I might be a bit paranoid, but could
> >     you verify by "which gr_modtool" that you're really running the
> >     modtool you want?
> >
> >     Best regards,
> >     Marcus
> >
> >
> >     On 04.06.2016 17:51, Richard Bell wrote:
> >>     Since I didn't get much feedback when I brought this up a few
> >>     weeks ago, I want to bring it up again to make sure you all see
> >>     it.  After using the default pybombs command to build a clean
> >>     install on Ubuntu 16.04, everything worked fine except that I
> >>     can't get gr_modtool working. No OOT Modules I make, old or brand
> >>     new, will make it through compile. There are cmake issues I've
> >>     never seen before.
> >>
> >>     Can someone confirm they have used gr_modtool on Ubuntu 16.04
> >>     successfully after installing via the pybombs default route.
> >>
> >>     Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >>     On Jun 3, 2016, at 7:42 PM, Eric Statzer
> >>     <<mailto:eric.stat...@gmail.com>eric.stat...@gmail.com
> >>     <mailto:eric.stat...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:19 AM Marcus Müller
> >>>     <marcus.muel...@ettus.com <mailto:marcus.muel...@ettus.com>>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>         Everyone should get a kick out of this: I had fixed this
> >>>>         once before [1] but it was actually YOU, Marcus, that broke
> >>>>         it again! [2]
> >>>         I wish that was true! First of all, we need to find a better
> >>>         way to fix that then to build libtool on practically all
> >>>         platforms from source.
> >>>         You really don't need libtool > 2.4.6 to build thrift. Works
> >>>         perfectly on my Fedora 22 with libtool 2.4.2 .
> >>>         The problem is not the libtool version, by the way.
> >>>         autoconf/aclocal just can't, for some reasons I really can't
> >>>         figure out, find the "default" system-wide M4 files
> >>>         containing the PKG_CHECK_MODULES macro under specific
> >>>         circumstances. It seems that installing libtool into the same
> >>>         prefix one is going to use later on fixes the problem (as the
> >>>         M4s end up in a location that aclocal ends up looking in).
> >>>         Have a test: if you edit the bootstrap.sh of thrift, and
> >>>         modify the
> >>>
> >>>         aclocal -I ./aclocal
> >>>
> >>>         line to
> >>>
> >>>         aclocal -I $(env -i aclocal --print-ac-dir) -I ./aclocal
> >>>
> >>>         the M4 syntax error disappears, at least for me. Of course,
> >>>         thrift wouldn't successfully build with those modifications,
> >>>         either, but that's really a long rabbit hole to go into :)
> >>>         Hence my curiosity!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     Alright, its all coming back to me now, I think you've got me
> >>>     straightened out again, Marcus.  I was definitely wrong on the
> >>>     pkg-config/libtool versions before, thanks for taking my hasty
> >>>     accusations so well!  This is the exact same sort of issue that I
> >>>     was running in to when running autoreconf for libosmo-dsp and I
> >>>     realized that having ANY version of pkg-config installed from
> >>>     source under the PYBOMBS_PREFIX would make these sort of errors
> >>>     go away, too.  I'm on-board with leaving the pkg-config and
> >>>     libtool versions alone and fixing the real underlying problems.
> >>>
> >>>     So, the thrift recipe was switched to using git for the source
> >>>     fetch around this time [3] due to a possible thrift bug.
> >>>     Question: now that thrift 0.9.3 is available in tarball form,
> >>>     might we want to switch back to using the release tarball?  The
> >>>     benefit of the tarball is that it already includes all of the
> >>>     required m4 macro files, and that makes ./configure run MUCH more
> >>>     smoothly.  In fact, this branch [4], which just switches to the
> >>>     tarball release of thrift 0.9.3, builds cleanly for me on CentOS
> >>>     7.  Give it a shot!
> >>>
> >>>     -Eric
> >>>
> >>>     [3]
> https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/commit/621c086b94e1f9b70f24034bf6fb6f7e15e5fa7c
> >>>     [4] https://github.com/estatz/gr-recipes/tree/thrift_tarball
> >>>     _______________________________________________
> >>>     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> >>>     Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
> >>>     https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to