Hi all, Just a heads up that this is fixed *and* I fixed another mistake I made by making the tarball with a method that left out the volk submodule. The same links are valid, but the tarball and signature are new. The signature is now ASCII armored and the new tarball has VOLK.
Cheers and looking forward to seeing everyone at GRCon soon, Nathan On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathan West-GR <nathan.w...@gnuradio.org> wrote: > Hi, > > You're right! My mistake... Using GPG is still hard for me! I won't have > access to the right key to fix this for a few more hours, but the signature > should be valid just not ascii armored output. > > $ gpg --verify gnuradio-3.7.10.1.tar.gz.asc gnuradio-3.7.10.1.tar.gz > gpg: Signature made Fri 19 Aug 2016 12:16:29 AM EDT using DSA key ID > BB8ED9B2 > gpg: checking the trustdb > gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model > gpg: depth: 0 valid: 2 signed: 1 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 2u > gpg: depth: 1 valid: 1 signed: 0 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 1f, 0u > gpg: next trustdb check due at 2017-08-27 > gpg: Good signature from "GNU Radio Project (Admin) <ad...@gnuradio.org>" > > Nathan > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Cinaed Simson <cinaed.sim...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi - there's a problem with the >> >> http://gnuradio.org/releases/gnuradio/gnuradio-3.7.10.1.tar.gz.asc >> >> file. >> >> It's not ASC. >> >> -- Cinaed >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >> > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
