Did you get a resolution on this issue?  We had an old app using UHD 3.5.4
that, once upgrade to 3.9.x or newer, drastically lowers the transmit
power.  In our case we're using subsampling, transmitting at 130 MHz.  I
don't know if that's related or not.  A while back I built a simple
flowgraph with a constant source and a USRP sink.  Built/installed the old
UHD, ran the flowgraph, and measured my output power on a spectrum analyzer
and it was as expected (-1s of dBm).   Built/installed newer UHD, re-ran
the flowgraph, and it was many 10s of dB lower.

I wanted to rerun my test, take plots and document things well, and write
an email to the list, but never got around to it.  For now my "solution"
has been to stick with the older UHD.

Has anybody else seen anything similar?  Michael, maybe try the older UHD,
unless you've figured out your issue.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Michael Skaggs <mskag...@umbc.edu> wrote:

> Using GRC 3.7.8, UHD 3.8.5. We had a spare BasicTX, but swapping it out
> provides the same effect. The o-scope is properly terminated.
>
> It seems like it has to be some way that we've set up the GRC test. I've
> attached the top_block.py and the .grc file to this message, perhaps this
> will shed some light on the situation.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Marcus Müller <marcus.muel...@ettus.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Also: The BasicTX's source impedance is 50Ω; make sure you properly
>> terminate either by setting your scope to 50Ω or by measuring with a high
>> scope impedance over a 50Ω resistor.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>> On 12/23/2016 10:50 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
>>
>> On 12/23/2016 01:45 PM, Michael Skaggs wrote:
>>
>> 1 MHz signal with a 6.25MSps rate. We just attempted a signal at 5MHz and
>> measured it at 114mV RMS, a 10MHz signal is 56mV RMS. The voltage seems to
>> drop as the signal frequency rises. Does this assure a hardware issue? Or
>> is there something else we can check?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Michael
>>
>> Thing is, there's not that much that can go wrong with a BASIC_TX.  It's
>> all passives.
>>
>> What version of UHD are you using?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Marcus D. Leech <mle...@ripnet.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/23/2016 10:26 AM, Michael Skaggs wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We're currently working with a BasicTX daughterboard attached to a N210
>>> USRP. We are using both outputs of the BasicTX in quadrature (I on one
>>> channel, Q on the other). The problem we are running into is that the
>>> output power of the BasicTX board seems very low. Looking at it on an
>>> o-scope, we are seeing around 166mV RMS on each channel, which seems lower
>>> than we would expect.
>>>
>>> We are using GNURadio Companion to transmit these waveforms, and it is a
>>> very simple setup. A single "Signal Source" block generating a sine wave
>>> into a "UHD: USRP Sink" block. The "amplitude" value is at it's near max
>>> without clipping in the ADC and since the daughterboard has no gain
>>> elements, "gain" does nothing, so we're kind of at a loss here.
>>>
>>> Any help is appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing 
>>> listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>
>>> What frequency?
>>> _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
>>> mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/
>>> listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing 
>> listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing 
>> listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to