Hi Marcus, What I do at the transmitter side is (QPSK signal): pulse shaping(Root Cosine FIR Filter ) ---> resampling (where the fractional resampler is inserted) --> low pass filter-->frequency shifter (move the signal to the frequency it belongs to with respect to the usrp's center frequency ) --> usrp
If I put low pass filter after resampler, does it mean I don't need to care about the anti-alias filtering offered by resampler that much and just treated it as a filter that help upsampling to the sampling rate I set? Also does it matter whether I put low pass filter before or after resampling? to my understanding, it will not change the spectrum, but the order of low pass filters is different since the rate is different. Thanks, Yang On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Marcus Müller <muel...@kit.edu> wrote: > Hi Andy, > > The fallacy I had in my own head was that the MMSE resampler also filters > sufficiently – I think that is not true; it's just a resampler, you need to > "select" (as in: filter everything else away) the appropriate bandwidth > yourself before. > > Therefore: Yang, you'll need to filter before to restrict your signal to a > Nyquist bandwidth that the resampled signal can represent without > ambiguities (anti-aliasing), then have the flexible MMSE resampler, then, > if necessary, suppress images. That's at least one times the effort of the > 1/64-bandwidth FIR from my last mail that you *must* do, if your signal is > not already sufficiently-bandlimited before. > > That leads me to the conclusion that you'd definitely want to first > decimate with a FIR and then flexibly interpolate/resample. > > You can, in fact, combine both, and then you (essentially) get working > principle of the "Polyphase arbitrary resampler": Build a polyphase > filterbank from a decimation filter (that's the "Decimating FIR" aspect), > and go through the phases in a way that approximates the sub-input-sample > delay you want at the output (that's the MMSE-filterbank-alike idea about > that). > > So, Yang, could you elaborate about what you do before (and after) the > resampler? What does your input signal's spectrum look like? > > Best regards, > Marcus > > > > On 2017-10-24 14:22, Andy Walls wrote: > >> On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 08:16 -0400, Andy Walls wrote: >> >>> Hi Marcus: >>> >>> Nice insights and plots. >>> >>> From: Marcus Müller >>>> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:10:23 +0200 >>>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>> From the above figure, I'd say: go for 256 taps; 50 dB of anti- >>>> aliasing should probably suffice. >>>> On my machine, the 256 tap FIR filter with decimation=64 ran about >>>> 20% faster than the fractional resampler; comparing what they do to >>>> white noise, I'd say that whilst the spectral shape of the 256 tap >>>> FIR is not perfect, the MMSE is pretty much unusable, I guess: >>>> >>> I'd just like to interject here that GNURadio's MMSE filterbank is >>> only >>> MMSE for input spectral components in the range [-sample_rate/4, >>> sample_rate/4]. >>> >>> Also it appears that the mmse/fractional_resampler blocks don't >>> perform >>> any explicit anti-alias filtering. So that's another reason to have >>> a >>> band-limiting filter out in front of it. >>> >> Oopsie, and maybe one after it too, since we're talking about >> decimation. >> >> -Andy >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
