Perfect!! Thank you :) 2017-11-17 12:42 GMT+01:00 Marcus Müller <muel...@kit.edu>:
> You'd pass that object – all the objects that you create in Python have > a name that you can pass around. > > Notice that you usually very much would want to avoid this. The blocks > run in different threads, so you need take care that accesses to your > shared object are thread save, e.g. by having internal mutexes. > > In your case, having a block that manages the socket, and which sends > GNU Radio messages to your other blocks, would sound easier and safer. > > Best regards, > Marcus > > On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 12:13 +0100, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo wrote: > > Hi Marcus, > > > > I apologize if I have not explained myself well. > > > > I want to use a global object (an open socket) inside blocks. Similar to > using a global variable with the 'Python Module' block. > > > > The problem is that I do not know how to access to an object/variable > created in 'Python Module' inside another module. > > > > Thank you. > > > > 2017-11-17 11:08 GMT+01:00 Marcus Müller <muel...@kit.edu>: > > > Hi Carlos, > > > I'm a little bit confused; this sounds a lot more like you want to > design a client/server protocol with logical "subchannels" or something > than a GNU Radio question. > > > > > > If you asked me, sounds like you wouldn't go for a single socket, but > three ZeroMQ sockets of the right usage paradigm (might be pub/sub, > req/rep, or any of the roundrobin ones). > > > > > > In any case, your block has no provisions for talking to a socket, so > not quite sure what you're asking me – "write a program that talks to > sockets" isn't really a great question for the GNU Radio mailing list ;) > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Marcus > > > > > > On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 10:07 +0100, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo wrote: > > > > Hi Marcus, > > > > > > > > It is the code: https://pastebin.com/Ts07d0wg > > > > > > > > Depends on the data of the block makes a request to the server or > another. I want to have a common socket for all the blocks, not to use one > client per block. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-11-16 20:56 GMT+01:00 Marcus Müller <muel...@kit.edu>: > > > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > > I don't know the blocks, hence I can't tell you anything about > them. > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Marcus > > > > > > > > > > On 16.11.2017 19:32, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo wrote: > > > > > > Thank you Marcus. > > > > > > > > > > > > Where do I create the socket and how I pass it to the blocks? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 2017 19:07, "Marcus Müller" <muel...@kit.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > Sure, unless the dataCapture blocks (which I don't know) have > a bug. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > Marcus > > > > > > > On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 15:26 +0100, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dataCapture blocks are TCP clients with different requests. > I want use the same socket for the 3 blocks. It is posible? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > > > > > > > > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > > > > > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
