> My questions are should I worry about this warning and try to use another blocks?
Yes, and yes! Use the header_payload_* blocks and the accompanying OFDM infrastructure as shown in the ofdm_tx / _rx / _loopback.grc examples. Best regards, Marcus On Tue, 2018-04-24 at 13:48 +0200, Kurniawan Irianto wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying sending packets from transmitter to receiver using ofdm examples > (benchmark_tx.py and benchmark_rx.py) and I came across warning like these. > > in benchmark_tx.py: > > The gr::digital::ofdm_mapper_bcv block has been deprecated > The gr::digital::ofdm_insert_preamble block has been deprecated > > and in benchmark_rx.py: > > The gr::digital::ofdm_sampler block has been deprecated > The gr::digital::ofdm_frame_acquisition block has been deprecated > The gr::digital::ofdm_frame_sync block has been deprecated > > I noticed there were a lot of packet losses when I saw the pktno number. My > questions are should I worry about this warning and try to use another > blocks? Does the deprecated blocks effect the number of packet losses in that > examples? > > I also realized those codes were very old examples and I am wondering if > there is an up to date example regarding the ofdm implementation in gnuradio. > > Any comments and suggestions would be nice and helpful. > > Thank you, > > Kurniawan > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio