forgot the link... sorry

https://kb.ettus.com/Building_and_Installing_the_USRP_Open-Source_Toolchain_(UHD_and_GNU_Radio)_on_Linux

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 12:22 PM Ali Dormiani <sdorm...@eng.ucsd.edu> wrote:

> I am running a server with Mint 19 and had none of these problems.
>
> I followed this Ettus page (word for word) to build GNUradio and UHD from
> source. (without pybombs?)
>
> From what I understand, Mint 19 = Ubuntu 18.04 + Windows-like User
> interface.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:31 AM Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/29/2018 11:18 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
>>
>> Well, this was unexpected... I got a failure in the UHD build phase:
>>
>> UHD build apparently failed
>> Exiting UHD build
>>
>> I just re-ran with logging turned on; the results are in the attached
>> build-gnuradio.log.gz file.
>>
>> Try doing a:
>>
>> sudo pip install setuptools
>>
>> Then re-running and see what happens.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/29/18 10:59 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marcus --
>>
>> I did as James Humphries suggested and added "|*19*" to the line where
>> *18* is.  I'm running the script now.
>>
>> In the "Checking for package..." section I got these two messages:
>>
>> Failed to find package 'libqwtplot3d-qt4-dev' in known package
>> repositories SOME THINGS MAY NOT BUILD AS A RESULT
>>
>> Failed to find package 'libzmq-dev' in known package repositories
>> SOME THINGS MAY NOT BUILD AS A RESULT
>>
>> I seem to recall that the libzmq-dev warning has been present for a
>> while, and isn't an issue.  I don't recall seeing the warning about
>> libqwtplot3d before, but Googling the package name turns up a couple of
>> hints that maybe it was removed from the amd64 version of Ubuntu Bionic
>> (18.04), which Linux Mint 19 is based upon.  Maybe qt4 has been deprecated
>> for qt5 in that version?  My debian-fu isn't enough to make sense of it
>> all.
>>
>> The script is still building UHD.  I'll report back whether it
>> successfully finishes.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/29/18 10:42 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
>>
>> On 10/29/2018 10:17 AM, Neel Pandeya wrote:
>>
>> Hello John:
>>
>> It looks like support for Linux Mint 19 has not yet been added. See lines
>> 525 through 566. The author can comment on-list with further information.
>> But you could probably try using the same list of packages as for Mint 18
>> in line 551.
>>
>> --Neel Pandeya
>>
>>
>> I rely on community input before build-gnuradio is updated for new OS
>> releases.  I'm simply not in a position to track all the distribs
>>    and do the recipes myself.
>>
>> If simply bypassing that check works, let me know, and I can update the
>> script....
>>
>>
>>
>> On 29 October 2018 at 07:11, John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com
>> <mailto:j...@febo.com> <j...@febo.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Thanks, Neel!  However, I just downloaded the version on github
>>     and it fails with the same error; the page indicates that the last
>>     mods were 11 months ago, which predates Mint 19.
>>
>>     John
>>     ----
>>
>>     On 10/29/18 10:07 AM, Neel Pandeya wrote:
>>
>>         The "build-gnuradio" script is now being maintained on GitHub.
>>
>>         https://github.com/ccera-astro/build-gnuradio
>>         <https://github.com/ccera-astro/build-gnuradio>
>> <https://github.com/ccera-astro/build-gnuradio>
>>
>>         --Neel Pandeya
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         On 29 October 2018 at 07:04, John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com
>>         <mailto:j...@febo.com> <j...@febo.com> <mailto:j...@febo.com
>> <j...@febo.com>
>>         <mailto:j...@febo.com> <j...@febo.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>             I'm trying to run the current build-gnuradio.sh script from
>>         sbrac.org <http://sbrac.org> <http://sbrac.org>
>> <http://sbrac.org> <http://sbrac.org> on a Linux
>>         Mint 19 machine and the
>>             script immediately fails, saying "Your Mint release must
>>         be at least
>>             Linux Mint 11 to proceed"
>>
>>             Is it safe to just bypass that check, or is there some sort
>> of
>>             incompatibilty with v19?  Or is sbrac.org
>>         <http://sbrac.org> <http://sbrac.org> <http://sbrac.org>
>> <http://sbrac.org> no
>>             longer the place to find the current version of the script?
>>
>>             Thanks,
>>             John
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>         Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>> <Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>>         <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>>         <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> <Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>>
>>         https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>         <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>>             <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>         <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing 
>> listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to