Hi Derek, I have to agree with Bogdan, it is standards complying but really annoying. I receive email from 10 - 15 lists and this one is the only one not altering the subject. My 2 cents, Adrian
On November 18, 2019 10:05:50 AM UTC, Derek Kozel <de...@bitstovolts.com> wrote: >Hi Bogdan, > >Our understanding is that the change is actually a fix and reversing it >would cause problems for an increasingly large percentage of email >users. The problem is that if a sender's email client/server signs the >message (increasingly common with DKIP) and then the list server edits >the subject line to add the "[discuss-gnuradio] " prefix then the >signature is invalid and some popular mail servers will penalize the >message when it evaluates it as being spam. Some servers simply reject >the message silently. > >All discuss-gnuradio emails do correctly have the list-id header in the >metadata so it is easy to filter them into a folder or add a label. > >Since there is a standards compliant way of identifying the >discuss-gnuradio messages it's unlikely that we'll change the server >setting back to adding the prefix. If the behavior of email >clients/servers change or a best-practices guidance comes out with a >way >of retaining the prefix we'll move to the most compliant behavior. > >Regards, >Derek > >On 18/11/2019 09:37, Bogdan Diaconescu wrote: >> Hi Markus, I know it might take some effort to fix the issue and if >it helps I will just say that missing the preamble is really annoying >as many of us are subscribed to other email groups with missing >preamble. That creates a really confusing situations. >> >> Bogdan >> >>> On 17 Nov 2019, at 20:54, Müller, Marcus (CEL) <muel...@kit.edu> >wrote: >>> >>
