Dear Brian, Marcus, and Derek,

Your help and advice is greatly appreciated, thank you very much. I will
look into how the PAPR might be reduced and if I do come up with something
which can be contributed to GNU radio, I will certainly look into that.

Take care,
Manav

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:36 PM Derek Kozel <de...@bitstovolts.com> wrote:

> To add on to what Marcus and Brian have said, one of the ways of slightly
> reducing this problem is Crest Factor Reduction. It would be very useful to
> have some of the standard CFR algorithms added to GNU Radio. Peak
> Cancellation is one that has looked promising to me. Peak Windowing and
> Noise Shaping are two others.
>
> If you do implement any of these methods please consider contributing them
> back to GNU Radio so that we can all benefit.
>
> Regards,
> Derek
>
> On 6/23/2020 3:49 PM, Brian Padalino wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:38 AM Manav Kohli <mpk2...@columbia.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This problem is visualized here:
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/w7kdmf9dewwdomx/20M_2974_20_15_nocal_packet_time_tx.png?dl=0
>>
>> This is an OFDM packet consisting of 6 symbols: the default sync word
>> 1&2, SIG field and three data symbols. The data symbols are QPSK modulated
>> and the sync words are BPSK.
>>
>> Is there any way that I could reduce or eliminate these large spikes that
>> even with a moderate baseband scaling still go considerably above a
>> magnitude of 1? I have tried to use different data, and a different number
>> of packet data symbols, but to no avail. I am definitely able to reduce the
>> overall baseband scaling and get those spikes within range, but this is not
>> desirable as I am trying to maximize transmit power.
>>
>> The usage of the USRP-2974 and sampling rate is immaterial; this happens
>> using a variety of different radios (should not matter as this is a GNU
>> radio "issue") and sampling rates.
>>
>> If anyone has seen this before or may have any advice, please let me know.
>>
>
> It's the nature of OFDM to have a high Peak-to-Average-Power Radio
> (PAPR).  You can look at PAPR reduction techniques, but otherwise you're in
> for around 10dB PAPR.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Brian
>
>>
>

Reply via email to