"When responding to a thread from Discuss Gnuradio, be sure to include it as a CC or
'Reply All'."
Yup. When I received the daily digest today, I realized my mistake. My bad.
(*waves at everyone*)
Thanks, Barry!
On 12/4/20 4:27 PM, Barry Duggan wrote:
Hi Gary,
Thank you for your correction. We have updated
https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/Quadrature_Demod and fixed the math
rendering as well :)
Also I have added your FM posts to
https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/SuggestedReading#GNU_Radio_Specific
You may be interested in https://pysdr.org/ in reference to your creating
filters using Python code.
Cheers!
---
Barry Duggan KV4FV
https://github.com/duggabe
P.S. When responding to a thread from Discuss Gnuradio, be sure to include it
as a CC or 'Reply All'.
On 12/3/20 8:22 PM, Gary Schafer wrote:
Hi, Barry! (*waves*)
That's great! Glad to help where I can! Can't tell you how much I appreciate
GRC. I'm actually working on a SDR class based on it.
With respect to the quad demod block documentation, the *text* that says, "the one-sample delayed
input and the conjugate undelayed signal", should read "the one-sample
delayed-&-conjugated input and the undelayed input signal". The delayed sample is also the one
that is conjugated.
FYI, the Tex code is correct.
I was working on demodding NOAA APT signals for my next post (cuz that is a fun one)
followed by a post on creating filters using Python code (the "tap" blocks). Do
you have suggestions for other posts?
Regards,
Gary
On 12/3/20 9:00 PM, Barry Duggan wrote:
Hi Gary,
You have some very interesting material there! I plan to include it in our
https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/SuggestedReading list.
In reference to the https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/Quadrature_Demod block,
what part do you think needs correcting? I work on the GNU Radio documentation
and would like to make sure things are stated correctly.
Thanks,
