In that case, please accept my apologies for the harsh tone!
Best regards, Marcus On 20.12.22 17:58, Adrian Musceac wrote:
Hi Marcus,The general trend of making web pages heavily dependent on JavascriptIt's an *optional* script that can be used to select what's visible, if scripting is available. If not available, you get a nicely structured plain text site, as before.Then please ignore my complaint, I thought this would make Javascript mandatory to see the content. Since this is not the case, it is obviously my fault for assuming that.and thus unusable for some of us is frankly sadOk, not my style to be *this* direct, but since you're actively trying to guilt-trip Barry: You're exposed to a website that works perfectly, contrary to your claims, both in obsolete browsers and under disabling JavaScript. It's just *better* with. I honestly don't think you get to lament your "loss" here.I apologise if it came off like that. It was not my intention to guilt-trip anyone. I am simply noticing more and more websites that don't work without Javascript or only work with certain browsers and I thought this will be the case too. Since I was obviously wrong I have to take your criticism as warranted. I am sorry if I have offended you or Barry. Regards, Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature