Thanks Volker for this example it will be very helpful . Btw which widget would be good to start with?
Thanks Rohit On Tue, Jan 31, 2023, 1:52 PM Volker Schroer <dl1...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Marcus, > > thanks for the clarification. > > Maybe this helps: > > Qt Gui sink is an example how to use the designer together with > gnuradio. You'll find it in qt-gui/lib. > > An example for an oot using the designer can be found in > > github.com/dl1ksv/gr-display > > -- Volker > > Hi Volker, > > > > I might have gotten my Qt jargon mixed up here :) Yeah I meant QT > > Designer. Sorry for the confusion! > > > > Cheers, > > Marcus > > > > On 30.01.23 17:29, Volker Schroer wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> but I think in this case the qt-designer is the tool to to design the > >> widget. I'm curious how, to integrate qt-creator in the build process. > >> > >> -- Volker > >> > >> Am 30.01.23 um 17:11 schrieb Marcus Müller: > >>> Hi everyone! > >>> > >>> Sadly, the reply chain on this email thread got broken, so it's > probably > >>> hard for you all to see, but: > >>> This is about a specific GSoC proposal, which does not at all imply > that > >>> you need Qt for every flowgraph. > >>> Exactly as Rohit describes, this is about making it easier to build a > >>> GUI for GNU Radio flowgraphs *should you decide you want graphical > >>> visualizations*. > >>> And if you do so, gr-qtgui is based on Qt, anyways. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Marcus > >>> > >>> On 30.01.23 17:02, Jim Melton wrote: > >>>> I'd propose that nothing you do *requires* Qt. There are many uses for > >>>> GUI-less flowgraphs. Qt is a heavyweight framework; it should not be > >>>> required in order to build GRC flowgraphs. > >>>> > >>>> --- > >>>> Jim Melton > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+jim.melton=sncorp....@gnu.org > >>>> <discuss-gnuradio-bounces+jim.melton=sncorp....@gnu.org> On Behalf Of > >>>> Marcus D. Leech > >>>> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2023 12:30 > >>>> To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > >>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Qt widgets Improvement > >>>> > >>>> On 29/01/2023 14:20, Rohit Bisht wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I'd like to start with "integrating gnu with qt creator" because it > >>>>> would make it easier to write code in the integrated qt environment > >>>>> and speed up build, run, and testing. I believe adjusting the cmake > >>>>> file and fixing paths to missing library files would be the way to go > >>>>> (though I'll require more directions on that). > >>>>> > >>>>> Then "adding new widgets" followed by "improving them" . > >>>> I guess it depends on what you think the dominant design doctrine > >>>> should be "gorgeous UI with the DSP as a kind of afterthought", > >>>> or "robust DSP with the UI as a kind of afterthought". I don't > >>>> think that Qt designer is a particularly productive way to design > >>>> the DSP bits of a DSP application. > >>>> > >>>> The whole "form is more important than function" is a bit of leftover > >>>> brain-death promulgated by Steve Jobs, and it was as > >>>> wrong-headed then as it is now, IMHO. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - SNC EMAIL: This email and any attachments are > >>>> confidential, may contain proprietary, protected, or export controlled > >>>> information, and are intended for the use of the intended recipients > >>>> only. Any review, reliance, distribution, disclosure, or forwarding of > >>>> this email and/or attachments outside of Sierra Nevada Corporation > >>>> (SNC) without express written approval of the sender, except to the > >>>> extent required to further properly approved SNC business purposes, is > >>>> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this > >>>> email, please notify the sender immediately, and delete all copies > >>>> without reading, printing, or saving in any manner. --- Thank You. > >>> > >> > >> > >