Oh, right. I remember that whole conversation about that function doing nothing. It got me again!
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 3:36 PM George Edwards <gedwards....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > Thank you very much, it works! > > I appreciate your help very much! > > George > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023, 11:05 AM John Sallay <jasal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The set_min_noutput_items function exists, but sadly it does nothing >> (literally nothing). I've traced the value through the scheduler code to >> verify this. The only way to mostly do what you want is through >> set_output_multiple (ie self.set_output_multiple(16). This will ensure >> that you always receive at least 16 samples and that the number of samples >> is a multiple of 16. It's not the best solution but it gets the job done. >> >> John >> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:37 PM Jeff Long <willco...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The function is there. Perhaps you're not calling it correctly, but I >>> can't tell. >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:11 AM George Edwards <gedwards....@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Jeff, >>>> Thanks for the suggestion. >>>> >>>> I tried set_min_noutput_items(16) first in the __init__() method, then >>>> the work() of Python file and each time I get the response Name Error: name >>>> 'set_min_noutput_items' is not defined. >>>> >>>> Any more suggestions! 🤔 >>>> >>>> George >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023, 7:03 PM Jeff Long <willco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Try: set_min_noutput_items(16) >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 5:39 PM George Edwards <gedwards....@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear GNURadio Community, >>>>>> I have a decimator OOT block doing my signal processing. It works >>>>>> well, but after 30 or epochs, it schedule an output of one sample which >>>>>> breaks my signal processing algorithm. Then the output gets scheduled to >>>>>> a >>>>>> good number and the algorithm starts working good again before going off >>>>>> script to scheduling an output of 1 sample again. Every time it does >>>>>> this, >>>>>> it breaks my signal processing algorithm. Is there a way to force the >>>>>> decimator to schedule a minimum number outputs, like say 16 samples >>>>>> (which >>>>>> would work for my algorithm because the correspondingnumber of input >>>>>> samples would be just fine)? >>>>>> >>>>>> Will appreciate any suggestion towards a solution. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>> >>>>>> George >>>>>> >>>>>
