Wow I can't believe I missed that it wasn't supported, anyway thanks everyone for replying.
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 7:01 PM <discuss-gnuradio-requ...@gnu.org> wrote: > Send Discuss-gnuradio mailing list submissions to > discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > discuss-gnuradio-requ...@gnu.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > discuss-gnuradio-ow...@gnu.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Discuss-gnuradio digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems (יותם זיס) > 2. Re: Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems (Daniel Estévez) > 3. Re: Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems (Marcus D. Leech) > 4. Re: Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems (Kevin McQuiggin) > 5. Re: Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems (Marcus D. Leech) > 6. Re: Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems (Marcus Müller) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:04:00 +0200 > From: יותם זיס <yotam.z...@gmail.com> > To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > Subject: Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems > Message-ID: > < > cabuyo04bgltudzcvrw7jhalfa7za6o0jtqu0obmbsnkxe_1...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi everyone, I'm currently working on a bpsk modem for S-band > communication with the Tevel and TAUSAT satellites. I recently > started reading about RFNoc and it intrigued me for use in my project since > I own a USRP B200. Would love some advice on whether or not to try this out > and if so how to implement it correctly, thanks. > > Attached - a picture of my flowgraph, currently the uplink is connected > directly to the downlink but usually i use a lime mini for transmission. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/attachments/20240126/7d9c9651/attachment.htm > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: Screenshot 2024-01-26 220105.png > Type: image/png > Size: 286075 bytes > Desc: not available > URL: < > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/attachments/20240126/7d9c9651/attachment.png > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 23:07:42 +0100 > From: Daniel Estévez <dan...@destevez.net> > To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems > Message-ID: <fb42d1fb-adbb-440d-aa02-1fcaed57e...@destevez.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" > > Hi Yotam, > > As far as I know, the B200 doesn't support RFNOC. From > > https://www.ettus.com/sdr-software/rfnoc/ > > "all USRP devices from the third-generation on (X300 Series, E300 > Series) are supported by RFNoC out-of-the-box". > > Best, > Daniel. > > On 26/01/2024 21:04, יותם זיס wrote: > > Hi everyone, I'm currently working on a bpsk modem for S-band > > communication with the Tevel and TAUSAT satellites. I recently > > started reading about RFNoc and it intrigued me for use in my project > > since I own a USRP B200. Would love some advice on whether or not to try > > this out and if so how to implement it correctly, thanks. > > > > Attached - a picture of my flowgraph, currently the uplink is connected > > directly to the downlink but usually i use a lime mini for transmission. > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 833 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > URL: < > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/attachments/20240126/2fb751a2/attachment.sig > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:21:50 -0500 > From: "Marcus D. Leech" <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> > To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems > Message-ID: <1d8d5771-8056-411c-97f9-7c1c90059...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On 26/01/2024 17:07, Daniel Estévez wrote: > > Hi Yotam, > > > > As far as I know, the B200 doesn't support RFNOC. From > > > > https://www.ettus.com/sdr-software/rfnoc/ > > > > "all USRP devices from the third-generation on (X300 Series, E300 > > Series) are supported by RFNoC out-of-the-box". > > > > Best, > > Daniel. > This is the case, yes. The FPGAs in the B2xx series aren't compatible > with the RFNOC toolchain for one, and aren't really > big enough to support the RFNOC framework inside the FPGA. > > > > > > On 26/01/2024 21:04, יותם זיס wrote: > >> Hi everyone, I'm currently working on a bpsk modem for S-band > >> communication with the Tevel and TAUSAT satellites. I recently > >> started reading about RFNoc and it intrigued me for use in my project > >> since I own a USRP B200. Would love some advice on whether or not to > >> try this out and if so how to implement it correctly, thanks. > >> > >> Attached - a picture of my flowgraph, currently the uplink is > >> connected directly to the downlink but usually i use a lime mini for > >> transmission. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:28:41 -0800 > From: Kevin McQuiggin <mcqui...@sfu.ca> > To: "Marcus D. Leech" <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> > Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems > Message-ID: <ffe68dc8-b12a-4ad2-8478-e6a024eeb...@sfu.ca> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > No it doesn’t! > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jan 26, 2024, at 14:22, Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On 26/01/2024 17:07, Daniel Estévez wrote: > >> Hi Yotam, > >> > >> As far as I know, the B200 doesn't support RFNOC. From > >> > >> https://www.ettus.com/sdr-software/rfnoc/ > >> > >> "all USRP devices from the third-generation on (X300 Series, E300 > Series) are supported by RFNoC out-of-the-box". > >> > >> Best, > >> Daniel. > > This is the case, yes. The FPGAs in the B2xx series aren't compatible > with the RFNOC toolchain for one, and aren't really > > big enough to support the RFNOC framework inside the FPGA. > > > > > >> > >>> On 26/01/2024 21:04, יותם זיס wrote: > >>> Hi everyone, I'm currently working on a bpsk modem for S-band > communication with the Tevel and TAUSAT satellites. I recently started > reading about RFNoc and it intrigued me for use in my project since I own a > USRP B200. Would love some advice on whether or not to try this out and if > so how to implement it correctly, thanks. > >>> > >>> Attached - a picture of my flowgraph, currently the uplink is > connected directly to the downlink but usually i use a lime mini for > transmission. > >> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:32:28 -0500 > From: "Marcus D. Leech" <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> > To: Kevin McQuiggin <mcqui...@sfu.ca> > Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems > Message-ID: <2d09d3a3-1b97-4365-a748-6f7202830...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On 26/01/2024 17:28, Kevin McQuiggin wrote: > > No it doesn’t! > Are we violently agreeing here? > > The B2xx family FPGAs aren't supported by the RFNOC toolchain, and > they're not very big. You could, probably "port" > the RFNOC toolchain to these FPGAs, but my understanding is that it > would be a lot of work. > > Regardless, officially, RNOC IS NOT SUPPORTED on B2xx hardware. > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Jan 26, 2024, at 14:22, Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On 26/01/2024 17:07, Daniel Estévez wrote: > >>> Hi Yotam, > >>> > >>> As far as I know, the B200 doesn't support RFNOC. From > >>> > >>> https://www.ettus.com/sdr-software/rfnoc/ > >>> > >>> "all USRP devices from the third-generation on (X300 Series, E300 > Series) are supported by RFNoC out-of-the-box". > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Daniel. > >> This is the case, yes. The FPGAs in the B2xx series aren't compatible > with the RFNOC toolchain for one, and aren't really > >> big enough to support the RFNOC framework inside the FPGA. > >> > >> > >>>> On 26/01/2024 21:04, יותם זיס wrote: > >>>> Hi everyone, I'm currently working on a bpsk modem for S-band > communication with the Tevel and TAUSAT satellites. I recently started > reading about RFNoc and it intrigued me for use in my project since I own a > USRP B200. Would love some advice on whether or not to try this out and if > so how to implement it correctly, thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Attached - a picture of my flowgraph, currently the uplink is > connected directly to the downlink but usually i use a lime mini for > transmission. > >> > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:26:27 +0100 > From: Marcus Müller <mmuel...@gnuradio.org> > To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Using RFNoC blocks for satellite systems > Message-ID: <bec31792-b45c-4020-ab0d-bf1bcd1f4...@gnuradio.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > This is a bit from the top of my head, so take with a grain of salt, but: > > The problem with a port, aside from the space in the FPGA of the B210 > simply being too > small, is that the CHDR crossbar, i.e., the actual "network operation > center" for the > namesake Network-on-Chip, is based on an AXI crossbar core that Xilinx > doesn't offer for > the 6th gen FPGAs. > Now, one could argue "well, write it yourself!", and they'd probably hit a > wall the moment > they start trying to work the same kind of asynchronous clock domain > crossings that the > 7th gen Xilinx FPGAs bring. But, that's hearsay to me, never looked into > what the IP core > actually uses on the FPGA. > > Best regards, > Marcus M > > On 26.01.24 23:32, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > > On 26/01/2024 17:28, Kevin McQuiggin wrote: > >> No it doesn’t! > > Are we violently agreeing here? > > > > The B2xx family FPGAs aren't supported by the RFNOC toolchain, and > they're not very big. > > You could, probably "port" > > the RFNOC toolchain to these FPGAs, but my understanding is that it > would be a lot of > > work. > > > > Regardless, officially, RNOC IS NOT SUPPORTED on B2xx hardware. > > > > > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >>> On Jan 26, 2024, at 14:22, Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> On 26/01/2024 17:07, Daniel Estévez wrote: > >>>> Hi Yotam, > >>>> > >>>> As far as I know, the B200 doesn't support RFNOC. From > >>>> > >>>> https://www.ettus.com/sdr-software/rfnoc/ > >>>> > >>>> "all USRP devices from the third-generation on (X300 Series, E300 > Series) are > >>>> supported by RFNoC out-of-the-box". > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> Daniel. > >>> This is the case, yes. The FPGAs in the B2xx series aren't compatible > with the RFNOC > >>> toolchain for one, and aren't really > >>> big enough to support the RFNOC framework inside the FPGA. > >>> > >>> > >>>>> On 26/01/2024 21:04, יותם זיס wrote: > >>>>> Hi everyone, I'm currently working on a bpsk modem for S-band > communication with the > >>>>> Tevel and TAUSAT satellites. I recently started reading about RFNoc > and it intrigued > >>>>> me for use in my project since I own a USRP B200. Would love some > advice on whether > >>>>> or not to try this out and if so how to implement it correctly, > thanks. > >>>>> > >>>>> Attached - a picture of my flowgraph, currently the uplink is > connected directly to > >>>>> the downlink but usually i use a lime mini for transmission. > >>> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Discuss-gnuradio Digest, Vol 255, Issue 19 > ************************************************* >
