On Oct 11, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Adam Fedor wrote:
On 2005-10-11 08:07:24 -0600 Andrew Ruder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should be easy enough that the gna and savannah folks could do
that for
us. We already have a project setup at gna.org, I'm not sure I'd see
any issues with hosting code on gna.org and keeping the mailing
lists,
bugs on savannah.gnu.org.
Savannah says it will have Arch soon. What about that?
The distributed VC frameworks (arch, (co)git(o), bitkeeper, etc.)
seem to be liked by big, heavily branched projects with many full-
time developers (e.g., linux). I'm not sure how much they are worth
it for the learning curve and mental overhead for smaller, more
unified, part-time-based projects like GNUstep. But I've never used
a distributed VC. Any thoughts from people who have?
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
