Le 19 oct. 05 à 04:17, Helge Hess a écrit :
Given the feedback of Richard, Wim, Rogelio the proposal seems to be dropped. The "6 months" timeout mentioned by some seems to be a rather ridiculous "excuse" to me since in this timeframe the systems _definitely_ won't change in any noticable way. Apparently the core developers are fine with CVS - which is rather surprising to me, but needs to be accepted.
I'm not a real core developer, but I would like to say I'm not fine with CVS, development without easy branching is currently a pain, I would be very happy to move to Subversion, especially when you consider decentralized possibilities offered by SVK.
The primary thing I would have hoped for are branches which might not directly reflect the "regligious GNUstep path", eg branches which support FHS. IMHO this would have been much easier with Svn and definitely won't happen as CVS branches.
True. Quentin. -- Quentin Mathé [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
