I'm not discarding, I'm saying that there is a lot of work. If we are interested in non-steppy browsers, it's not hard to embed Chromium/Blink using CAF, nor is it hard to just be silly and reparent an X11 browser window. Or, well, just use a web engine inside its common host browser.
If we are discussing a port, presumably we see advantages to tight integration (themes, services, GS open/save dialogue, more?) and if so, we'd want something like a GS port of a browser. WebKit is a good candidate, just, let's not present it as a lightweight project because it's anything but. On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, 15:13 Liam Proven <lpro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 August 2017 at 15:42, Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net> wrote: > > > WebKit's Mac port uses loads of APIs that are available only under macOS, > > too. It should not come as a surprise that it heavily relies on Core > > Animation, for example, if you compare CA with some of the more recent > > additions to CSS (animations, transforms, etc). > > All right, point. > > But KHTML still survives, doesn't it? And Blink, which is the > Chrome/Chromium fork, so presumably not OS X-dependant? > > This is not my area of knowledge, so sorry for stating what is > probably very obvious and has been examined and disregarded for good > reasons. > > -- > Liam Proven • Profile: https://about.me/liamproven > Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lpro...@gmail.com > Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven • Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven > UK: +44 7939-087884 <+44%207939%20087884> • ČR/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 > 702 829 053 <+420%20702%20829%20053> > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
