On Fri 22 Nov 2019 at 17:41, Fred Kiefer <fredkie...@gmx.de> wrote: > I really don’t see gcc support is itself holding us back. At least not > more than the incomplete CoreFoundation, or the fact that base is not build > on top of core base,
Or GUI on top of Core Graphics which would then have its backends... but that’s too deep of a rabbit hole :( the binary incompatible of Foundation and GNUstep base or the missing usage > of C++ in the implementation of GNUstep. Now, I see what David says about use of C++ in implementation of Foundation... but I’d expect that putting C++ would bring the compilation times up for everyone. Not a showstopper, but there’s something cool about all of GNUstep being buildable really quickly (configure steps usually taking longer than the build of the project itself). -- Sent from Gmail Mobile
